Skip to main content

Translate

The "Tale as Old as Time" Has Been Transformed, But Is It A Prince or a Beast?

I love Beauty and the Beast. I have seen the animated film countless times, and have even performed in two productions of the stage musical. As a result, I know the story rather well...

That is... Until I saw this version...

Disney has hit it out of the park once again, proving the effectiveness of these live action remakes of the classics.




Emma Watson clearly embodies the character of belle, but also has her unique version, having more in-depth character that justifies how she grows throughout the film. 

This is a major plus for this film. We get to learn the backstories of these beloved characters, even more than the original and the musical give us. We learn how the beast became spoiled, selfish, and unkind. We learn the fate of Belle's mother (seriously, why does Disney seem to hate protagonist's mothers), and an origin for Gaston and his ego. In addition to the enhanced development of character, Disney improved the story by filling in several plot holes of the original, such as how the spell is lifted, how Phillipe knew where the castle was, and WHY DOESN'T THE TOWN REMEMBER THERE IS A CASTLE AND A FORMER PRINCE? This is a question that really needed to be answered for the realistic style the film takes on.

I will not list every major change in the film, as it would take a very long time to list them all. However, there are revisions to the music and new songs added, some similar to the musical. These were incredible. While Belle doesn't sing "Home", from the musical, the score of this song is heard as Belle is introduced to her bedroom. Beast, rather than a mere roar as Belle leaves to save her father, sings a lamenting song, similar in tone to that of "If I Can't Love Her", but it has been customized for this iteration of the Beast.

I will admit I had my concerns looking at the design of Mrs. Potts and Chip. My concern was that they looked rather painted-on, rather than integrated fully into the porcelain. However, closer inspection during the film showed flakes in the paint around their eyes and mouths, giving the aesthetic that these faces were intruding, rather than just hovering. 

And this bring me to the best part of the film, in my opinion: The Enchanted Objects. Everyone knows one of the most iconic moments is "Be Our Guest", and this film is no exception. The CGI is fast and technical, just like the original. However, I almost like this version better, as the lighting playing off of the objects really is an incredible thing to observe. at no point do the objects look fake. And the humanization of the characters makes it all the more powerful when it seems the day is lost.

This version is much darker than the original, and it works so much better. Being based in realism, there is a lot at stake for the characters, making the stakes much higher, and the feeling of hopelessness more prominent. In fact, as each petal falls, the castle falls more and more to ruins, showing the desolation and loss of hope in the characters.

The film does have a lot of comedic moments to help break this tension, especially in witty and innocent one-liners. Even LeFou has a few truly hilarious moments, especially during Gaston. I feel it necessary to address the controversy with LeFou as a stereotypical gay character. There have been theaters who pulled the film over this, and a decent amount of backlash over Josh Gad's performance. I will say I enjoyed the jovial nature of the character, and the character's sexuality made sense for the character, and Josh Gad played it well. There are even some great jokes at times based on this character trait, especially during the battle. However, I had a little problem with the lines, which sought to remind you nearly every time he was on screen that he was gay. This actually got rather annoying for me, as it felt like a political move rather than a character choice in the script.

If you are looking for a frame-by-frame remake like the trailer hinted, this may not be for you. But, if you enjoyed some of the creative choices from the spin-off sequels, than grab some popcorn, sit back and enjoy this modern retelling of the "Tale as Old As Time".

Certain as the Sun, Rising in the East, Go and see Beauty and the Beast.

Let me know what you thought of Beauty and the Beast in the comments below.

Click here to order the movie.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is It Practically Perfect in Every Way?

*This review will contain spoilers for Mary Poppins Returns Many decades ago, Mary Poppins arrived on Cherry Tree Lane to amaze and enchant the silver screen. Now, Disney has released a sequel, but is it as incredible as all those years ago? In my opinion, this film manages to capture the essence of the original impeccably. From the high energy magic to the blurred lines between reality and imagination, the feel is absolutely astounding, and accurately captures the essence of the original, but with a few changes. Set 15 years after the original, Michael Banks, now a father of three, is about to lose the beloved family home from a loan. This places him in some paths similar to those of his father, including snapping at his children. The arrival of Mary leads the family on a path of discovery and growth, all the while educating the viewers on remaining optimistic in dark times, as there's "Nowhere to go but up". Emily Blundt plays a different, almost slightly cold...
Post a Comment
Read more

Cars 3 Races Strong After Sequel's Crash

*This review will contain spoilers for Cars 3 Some of you may know by now that I enjoyed the first cars movie, even enough that I placed in the number 10 slot on my Top 10 PIXAR Films list . The same could not be said for the sequel, which tried to change character focuses and genres, resulting in an overly complicated film, one that is arguably the worst film PIXAR has released to date. Because of this, I was rather concerned when I heard the announcement of Cars 3 . I was worried that the film would be one of two things: 1. a re-skin of the original film in order to regain support for the franchise, or 2. something completely different from the last two films, in another bold change that would wreck the franchise even more. Boy was I wrong... While the film does return to the basic story of Lightning McQueen trying to win the big race, it changes the tone and morals in an alarmingly deep direction. Let me explain... When McQueen wrecks at the beginning of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Literal "Ghost in the Shell": Anime Spirit in a Live Action Body

*This Review will contain spoilers for Ghost in the Shell . I am not an Anime person. I just wanted to state that at the beginning of this review, as my opinions are not based in a former enjoyment of Anime. That being said, this film has me interested in this genre of entertainment and animation film. The live action adaptation of Ghost in the Shell felt like an anime in spirit, but a live action "shell" (pun intended). I found the cinematography remarkable in this film, as numerous shots felt like panels from a graphic novel, similar to how The Walking Dead  occasionally copies a shot directly from an illustration. However, this feeling was present throughout the film. A fantastic example comes when Major strains her muscles ripping open the tank. The splitting of the muscle and the particles flying off feel like an image from a comic book. It is shots like this that made for an inclusive experience. While I saw the film in 2D, I could see the 3D version havin...
Post a Comment
Read more