Skip to main content

Translate

The "Tale as Old as Time" Has Been Transformed, But Is It A Prince or a Beast?

I love Beauty and the Beast. I have seen the animated film countless times, and have even performed in two productions of the stage musical. As a result, I know the story rather well...

That is... Until I saw this version...

Disney has hit it out of the park once again, proving the effectiveness of these live action remakes of the classics.




Emma Watson clearly embodies the character of belle, but also has her unique version, having more in-depth character that justifies how she grows throughout the film. 

This is a major plus for this film. We get to learn the backstories of these beloved characters, even more than the original and the musical give us. We learn how the beast became spoiled, selfish, and unkind. We learn the fate of Belle's mother (seriously, why does Disney seem to hate protagonist's mothers), and an origin for Gaston and his ego. In addition to the enhanced development of character, Disney improved the story by filling in several plot holes of the original, such as how the spell is lifted, how Phillipe knew where the castle was, and WHY DOESN'T THE TOWN REMEMBER THERE IS A CASTLE AND A FORMER PRINCE? This is a question that really needed to be answered for the realistic style the film takes on.

I will not list every major change in the film, as it would take a very long time to list them all. However, there are revisions to the music and new songs added, some similar to the musical. These were incredible. While Belle doesn't sing "Home", from the musical, the score of this song is heard as Belle is introduced to her bedroom. Beast, rather than a mere roar as Belle leaves to save her father, sings a lamenting song, similar in tone to that of "If I Can't Love Her", but it has been customized for this iteration of the Beast.

I will admit I had my concerns looking at the design of Mrs. Potts and Chip. My concern was that they looked rather painted-on, rather than integrated fully into the porcelain. However, closer inspection during the film showed flakes in the paint around their eyes and mouths, giving the aesthetic that these faces were intruding, rather than just hovering. 

And this bring me to the best part of the film, in my opinion: The Enchanted Objects. Everyone knows one of the most iconic moments is "Be Our Guest", and this film is no exception. The CGI is fast and technical, just like the original. However, I almost like this version better, as the lighting playing off of the objects really is an incredible thing to observe. at no point do the objects look fake. And the humanization of the characters makes it all the more powerful when it seems the day is lost.

This version is much darker than the original, and it works so much better. Being based in realism, there is a lot at stake for the characters, making the stakes much higher, and the feeling of hopelessness more prominent. In fact, as each petal falls, the castle falls more and more to ruins, showing the desolation and loss of hope in the characters.

The film does have a lot of comedic moments to help break this tension, especially in witty and innocent one-liners. Even LeFou has a few truly hilarious moments, especially during Gaston. I feel it necessary to address the controversy with LeFou as a stereotypical gay character. There have been theaters who pulled the film over this, and a decent amount of backlash over Josh Gad's performance. I will say I enjoyed the jovial nature of the character, and the character's sexuality made sense for the character, and Josh Gad played it well. There are even some great jokes at times based on this character trait, especially during the battle. However, I had a little problem with the lines, which sought to remind you nearly every time he was on screen that he was gay. This actually got rather annoying for me, as it felt like a political move rather than a character choice in the script.

If you are looking for a frame-by-frame remake like the trailer hinted, this may not be for you. But, if you enjoyed some of the creative choices from the spin-off sequels, than grab some popcorn, sit back and enjoy this modern retelling of the "Tale as Old As Time".

Certain as the Sun, Rising in the East, Go and see Beauty and the Beast.

Let me know what you thought of Beauty and the Beast in the comments below.

Click here to order the movie.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Last Jedi Feels Disconnected From the Force

*This review contains Major Spoilers for Star Wars: The Last Jedi I remember watching the closing moments of The Force Awakens, and I was really hyped for the next installment, as Luke was going to return to the screen. The trailer's foreboding dialogue had me intrigued by the thought of where they might be going... Would Rey turn to the dark side?... Has Luke turned dark?... Who is Snook, and how does he fit in the the overall story? And then I saw this film... And it wasn't at all what I expected it to be. While the film itself captures the style of the cinematic series, it runs into some significant challenges with its story, and what should have been significant moments got crossed out in favor of a side story that wasn't necessary. This film has too many self-contained stories that don't have much interconnection. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, unless the side stories take up time that should be given to more prominent problems. I was excited t

Jigsaw: The Piece That Doesn't Fit the Puzzle

*This review will contain spoilers for Jigsaw **This review will discuss scenes of intense fictional violence. Reader discretion advised. Before I actually begin this review, I find it important to note that I, in fact, enjoyed this film. I was super excited to see this franchise return, and it was a good journey. With that being said, there are definitely major issues with this film. And with that, let's begin... Ten years ago, the team behind the Saw franchise disbanded, stating that they would not return to the franchise unless they had a story to tell... Now, they are back to tell the story... That makes absolutely no sense! While the film delivers what Saw fans desire (creatively diabolical games, a creative twist, and a creepy puppet), the film fails to actually do what it wanted to. The film simply fails in following the lore of the franchise. Let me explain... The franchise follows John Kramer, who, after losing his unborn child and being diagnosed with ter

Why "13 Reasons Why" Is Deeper Than Just Suicide

*This article, and the resulting series, will contain spoilers for 13 Reasons Why . **This article, and the resulting series, will discuss topics of Sexual Assault, Sexual Harassment, and Suicide. Reader Discretion is advised. "Hey. It's Hannah" These were the opening words of the tapes in 13 Reasons Why , which I reviewed last year ( Read the Review ). Many people don't notice an important comment in this intro though: "Don't adjust your radio, or whatever you are hearing this on." This implies that Hannah intended for the tapes to go public. She expected the listeners to fail. Or did she ever want them to remain a secret... I thought about this about a week back, but never had a reason to discuss this idea. Until I saw this on Twitter the other day: This got me thinking again: If the main point was Hannah's ultimate suicide, why would that warrant a second season? Granted, it could be focused on the lawsuits filed by